how does he have a tattoo? cuz why does that bunny have a tattoo when he has fur all over his body? its just ink under your skin but the fur would cover it. also i just watch the first 2 episodes of kamen rider agito and the main character has so much aura
I am inclined to hypothesize that within the intricate taxonomy of anthropomorphic character design—colloquially encapsulated under the term “furry”—there exists a variegated continuum of integumentary configurations. The subject under discussion appeared to exemplify a dermal-follicular composite, wherein fur ostensibly overlays an underlying epidermal substrate. However, if we adopt the hypothetical premise of fur existing in the absence of discernible skin, one might plausibly construe the alleged “tattoo” not as a dermal pigment application, but rather as a chromatic alteration of the keratinous filaments themselves. Numerous explanatory models present themselves, and the spectrum of speculative theories remains vast. An astute question, anonymous inquirer.
Bread 👍
I didn’t read this, but I’m sure it’s Romance
Ok, I read it. It’s unfortunately not Romance
Unfortunately? Bro has his priorities curved..
Haha,
Nice one.
Finally an good comic! But its still short….
Nice comic
Rating:
Story, 3/5
Characters, 3/5
Jerkoablity, 3/5
Art, 3/5
Total, 12/20
– honeypot
Only 3 on art? Imo its a 4,5
PVP o miedo
Pussy vs Penis
Both
Both is good.
Nice art style
how does he have a tattoo? cuz why does that bunny have a tattoo when he has fur all over his body?
its just ink under your skin but the fur would cover it.
also i just watch the first 2 episodes of kamen rider agito and the main character has so much aura
Dont ask too many questions, it is porn
Nah, it’s funny asking questions about porn
Also are you that one Anon who wanted to watch Kamen Rider after reading Kamen Rider Guy’s peam takes on it?
I am inclined to hypothesize that within the intricate taxonomy of anthropomorphic character design—colloquially encapsulated under the term “furry”—there exists a variegated continuum of integumentary configurations. The subject under discussion appeared to exemplify a dermal-follicular composite, wherein fur ostensibly overlays an underlying epidermal substrate. However, if we adopt the hypothetical premise of fur existing in the absence of discernible skin, one might plausibly construe the alleged “tattoo” not as a dermal pigment application, but rather as a chromatic alteration of the keratinous filaments themselves. Numerous explanatory models present themselves, and the spectrum of speculative theories remains vast. An astute question, anonymous inquirer.
-L